On 12/15/2016 8:11 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
On 12/7/2016 6:41 AM, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
On 12/7/2016 1:18 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
On 12/4/2016 6:17 PM, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>
---
lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h
index 3c45a1f..6f5673f 100644
--- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h
+++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h
@@ -1626,6 +1626,7 @@ struct rte_eth_dev {
eth_rx_burst_t rx_pkt_burst; /**< Pointer to PMD receive function. */
eth_tx_burst_t tx_pkt_burst; /**< Pointer to PMD transmit function. */
struct rte_eth_dev_data *data; /**< Pointer to device data */
+ struct rte_device *device;
I believe this change should not be part of a PMD patchset. This change
is more generic than the PMD.
Won't Shreyansh's patch already do this?
I agree that this patch is not a fit for this PMD patchset, Shreyansh's
patch is not yet doing it. He will be taking care of it next.
So till Shreyansh provide the support, we need it.
If you need it, what do you think sending this as a separate patch? And
when accepted, your driver can use it?
I will prefer to keep this patch as the first patch in my patchset. If
Shreyansh's patch come on time, we can easily remove it.
const struct eth_driver *driver;/**< Driver for this device */
const struct eth_dev_ops *dev_ops; /**< Functions exported by PMD */
struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev; /**< PCI info. supplied by probing */
