On 12/20/2016 3:18 PM, Vincent JARDIN wrote: > Le 20/12/2016 à 05:48, Chen, Jing D a écrit : >> That's a collaboration with another team. we'll follow-up that but not >> guarantee >> it will happen. >> May I ask if my reply make it clear? Still NAC for this patch? > > Yes still nack, I am not confident with this PF approach since you are > breaking Linux PF behavior. It does not provide guarantees with PF. > Something is missing to guarantee the compatibilities.
Hi Vincent, Mark, What do you think separating the mentioned patch (patch 24/29) from patchset and submit as a standalone patch, so that it can be discussed more without blocking the patchset? Thanks, ferruh > > Thank you, > Vincent >