On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 11:20:09AM +0000, Nipun Gupta wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jerin Jacob
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 14:55
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: thomas.monja...@6wind.com; bruce.richard...@intel.com; Hemant
> > Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>; gage.e...@intel.com;
> > harry.van.haa...@intel.com; Jerin Jacob <jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com>
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/6] eventdev: implement PMD registration
> > functions
> >
> > This patch adds infrastructure for registering the vdev or
> > the PCI based event device.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob <jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com>
> > Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richard...@intel.com>
> > ---
> > lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.c | 236
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev_pmd.h | 111 +++++++++++++
> > lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev_version.map | 6 +
> > 3 files changed, 353 insertions(+)
> >
>
> <snip>
>
> > +
> > +struct rte_eventdev *
> > +rte_event_pmd_vdev_init(const char *name, size_t dev_private_size,
> > + int socket_id)
>
> Isn't there any requirement to have a clean-up function corresponding to
> rte_event_pmd_vdev_init?
I can add one for completeness. I will send a patch on this.
>
> > +{
> > + struct rte_eventdev *eventdev;
> > +
> > + /* Allocate device structure */
> > + eventdev = rte_event_pmd_allocate(name, socket_id);
> > + if (eventdev == NULL)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
>
> <snip>
>
> Regards,
> Nipun
