Hi Gaëtan, > -----Original Message----- > From: Gaëtan Rivet [mailto:gaetan.ri...@6wind.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 5:05 PM > To: Lu, Wenzhuo > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Wu, Jingjing > Subject: Re: Too much print of testpmd > > Hi Wenzhuo, > > On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 05:10:44AM +0000, Lu, Wenzhuo wrote: > > Hi Gaetan, > > > > When using DPDK PF + DPDK VF, there's too much print like, > > > > Port 0: VF Mbox event > > > > > > > > Seems it's not good to print every event directly. If it's necessary, is > > it better to redirect the output to a log file? > > > > Thanks. > > > > I'm not convinced of the logfile solution. I'd like to keep it simple and > contained. Logfile means having to provide a name, or use a default one > with several drawbacks, and a pretty leaky design. > > I will add a handle mask that will enable or disable this logging feature. The > default mask would then enable it for LSC and other such sporadic events, > while disabling it for the VF Mbox one. It will be able to be fine-tuned and > configured at runtime by a parameter and/or testpmd command. > > I'll propose it soon. Agree. Log file may be too heavy. The switches for the print is good enough.
> > > > > > > > > > > Best regards > > > > Wenzhuo Lu > > > > > > -- > Gaëtan Rivet > 6WIND
