20/06/2017 12:18, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy:
> On 08/06/2017 20:12, Jamie Lavigne wrote:
> > Currently when a malloc_elem is split after resizing, any padding
> > present in the elem is ignored. This causes the resized elem to be too
> > small when padding is present, and user data can overwrite the beginning
> > of the following malloc_elem.
> >
> > Solve this by including the size of the padding when computing where to
> > split the malloc_elem.
> >
> > Fixes: af75078fece3 ("first public release")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jamie Lavigne <[email protected]>
>
> Acked-by: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy <[email protected]>
Applied, thanks
