05/07/2017 11:32, Dumitrescu, Cristian:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 12:48 AM
> > To: Dumitrescu, Cristian <cristian.dumitre...@intel.com>
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Singh, Jasvinder <jasvinder.si...@intel.com>; Yigit,
> > Ferruh <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>; hemant.agra...@nxp.com;
> > jerin.jacobkollanukka...@cavium.com; Lu, Wenzhuo
> > <wenzhuo...@intel.com>; techbo...@dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] net/softnic: sw fall-back for traffic
> > management
> > 
> > 08/06/2017 18:43, Dumitrescu, Cristian:
> > > <snip> ...
> > > >
> > > > I'm sure I'm missing something.
> > > > In my understanding, we do not need to change the ops:
> > > >         - if the device offers the capability, let's call the ops
> > > >         - else call the software fallback function
> > > >
> > >
> > > What you might be missing is the observation that the approach you're
> > describing requires changing each and every PMD. The changes are also
> > intrusive: need to change the ops that need the SW fall-back patching, also
> > need to change the private data of each PMD (as assigned to the opaque
> > dev->data->dev_private) to add the context data needed by the patched
> > ops. Therefore, this approach is a no-go.
> > >
> > > We are looking for a generic approach that can gracefully and 
> > > transparently
> > work with any PMD.
> > 
> > Nobody is participating in this discussion.
> > Can we discuss how to proceed in the technical board meeting?
> 
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> We are working to finalize a new version of the Soft NIC PMD which has a much 
> simplified/straightforward design (we'll explain in the cover letter). We 
> expect to send it in the next few days, hopefully we can target RC2.

Thanks for continuing to work on it.
We will probably avoid a last minute integration of this new design in 17.08.
So it could become a priority topic for 17.11.

> I propose you take another look at this version and then decide if we need TB 
> involvement or not?

OK, let's wait this version.

Reply via email to