18/07/2017 11:39, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 7/13/2017 10:17 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 13/07/2017 10:14, Gaëtan Rivet:
> >> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 08:52:33AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >>> 12/07/2017 22:39, Gaëtan Rivet:
> >>>> Hi Thomas,
> >>>>
> >>>> Nice idea. A few remarks below:
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 08:28:12PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >>>>> FOREACH_SUBDEV(sdev, i, dev) {
> >>>>> if (sdev->state != DEV_PARSED)
> >>>>> continue;
> >>>>> da = &sdev->devargs;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>
> >>>> Superfluous line.
> >>>
> >>> I don't think so :) It is isolating the "skip" block with its comment.
> >>>
> >>>>> + /* skip plugged out devices */
> >>>>> + if (! first_init
> >>>>> + && sdev->cmdline == NULL
> >>>>> + && strcmp(da->bus->name, "vdev") != 0) {
> >>>>
> >>>> Use first_init == false instead of negation.
> >>>> && should be at the end of the line instead of the start of the next
> >>>> one.
> >>>
> >>> Yes
> >>>
> >>>> Indentation is wrong.
> >>>
> >>> No, the coding style is to put 2 tabs for continuation lines.
> >>>
> >>>>> + da->bus->scan();
> >>>>> + if (bus->find_device(NULL, cmp_dev_name,
> >>>>> da->name) == NULL)
> >>>>> + continue; /* device not found */
> >>>>
> >>>> da->bus->find_device instead of bus->find_device.
> >>>> This function cannot find the device back currently on the PCI bus,
> >>>> blocking the plugging of VF.
> >>>>
> >>>> The PCI bus will scan the VF while no rte_devargs exists to
> >>>> describe it within the global list. If the device exists, it will
> >>>> detect it, allocate it and then set its name.
> >>>> Without any rte_devargs, the name of a PCI device falls back to its
> >>>> canonical name (DomBDF instead of BDF). The name comparison with
> >>>> da->name can only succeed if the slave was declared using the DomBDF
> >>>> format.
> >>>>
> >>>> The fix is to do a deep copy of the rte_devargs (the API has been
> >>>> sent previously with the rte_devargs rework but I have since removed
> >>>> it) and insert it using rte_eal_devargs_insert(). This is essentially
> >>>> the solution I used for the rte_eal_hotplug_add() fix[1].
> >>>>
> >>>> The alternative fix is to propose an API for buses to transform device
> >>>> names into their canonical form on demand... And it would certainly only
> >>>> be useful for the PCI bus.
> >>>>
> >>>> The issue is discussed there:
> >>>> [1]: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-July/071155.html
> >>>
> >>> OK, I was not aware of this exact issue.
> >>> So I will wait above fix.
> >>
> >> The fix above will not solve this issue.
> >> If you are waiting for a proper, general fix, I don't think it will
> >> arrive anytime soon.
> >>
> >> I have the rte_eal_devargs_clone and a working version that I can send
> >> in-reply-to if you want. But that's an API extension while in RC2 so...
> >
> > No worries, it can be fixed in 17.11.
> >
>
> What is the status of the patch, is this patch rejected for this
> release, or will be merged into existing failsafe?
I think this patch is rejected.
