Another thing, if add 17.11, the end is 17.08 or EXPERIMENTAL? Best Regards, Xiaoyun Li
> -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Li, Xiaoyun > Sent: Thursday, October 5, 2017 19:19 > To: Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.anan...@intel.com>; Richardson, > Bruce <bruce.richard...@intel.com> > Cc: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo...@intel.com>; Zhang, Helin > <helin.zh...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Thomas Monjalon > (thomas.monja...@6wind.com) <thomas.monja...@6wind.com> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/3] eal/x86: run-time dispatch over > memcpy > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ananyev, Konstantin > > Sent: Thursday, October 5, 2017 17:37 > > To: Li, Xiaoyun <xiaoyun...@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce > > <bruce.richard...@intel.com> > > Cc: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo...@intel.com>; Zhang, Helin > > <helin.zh...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Thomas Monjalon > > (thomas.monja...@6wind.com) <thomas.monja...@6wind.com> > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 1/3] eal/x86: run-time dispatch over memcpy > > > > > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/rte_eal_version.map > > > b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/rte_eal_version.map > > > index 8c08b8d..15a2fe9 100644 > > > --- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/rte_eal_version.map > > > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/rte_eal_version.map > > > @@ -241,5 +241,6 @@ EXPERIMENTAL { > > > rte_service_runstate_set; > > > rte_service_set_stats_enable; > > > rte_service_start_with_defaults; > > > + rte_memcpy_ptr; > > > > > > } DPDK_17.08; > > > > I am not an expert in DPDK versioning system, But shouldn't we create > > a > > 17.11 section here? > Should we create a 17.11 section? I am not sure who to ask for. > > > Also I think an alphabetical order should be preserved here. > OK. > > > Konstantin
