Hi Kuba, Just a soft reminder. :) Maintainers will make the decision.
Ferruh, Thomas, Your opinion? Thanks Zhiyong > -----Original Message----- > From: Kozak, KubaX > Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 2:58 PM > To: Yang, Zhiyong <[email protected]>; Ananyev, Konstantin > <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Jastrzebski, MichalX K > <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] l3fwd-acl: fix unchecked return value > > Thanks Zhiyong, > > Should I correct this patch and resend to dpdk or is it just a suggestion for > future? > > Regards, > Kuba > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Yang, Zhiyong > >Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 08:56 > >To: Kozak, KubaX <[email protected]>; Ananyev, Konstantin > <[email protected]> > >Cc: [email protected]; Kozak, KubaX <[email protected]>; [email protected] > >Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] l3fwd-acl: fix unchecked return value > > > >Hi，kubax, > > > >When you form the patch , you should add v2 and changes in v2. > >Besides that, please be free to add > >Acked-by: zhiyong yang<[email protected]> > > > >Thanks > >Zhiyong > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: dev [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kuba Kozak > >> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 7:48 PM > >> To: Ananyev, Konstantin <[email protected]> > >> Cc: [email protected]; Kozak, KubaX <[email protected]>; > [email protected] > >> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] l3fwd-acl: fix unchecked return value > >> > >> Add return value check and error handling for fseek call. > >> > >> Coverity issue: 143435 > >> Fixes: 361b2e9559fc ("acl: new sample l3fwd-acl") > >> Cc: [email protected] > >> Cc: [email protected] > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Kuba Kozak <[email protected]> > >> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <[email protected]> > >> ---
