Hi Ferruh, OK, I see. I will send another patches to fix them as soon as possible.
Thanks Zhiyong > -----Original Message----- > From: Yigit, Ferruh > Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 10:20 AM > To: Yang, Zhiyong <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > [email protected]; Richardson, Bruce <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] fix port id type > > On 10/13/2017 3:04 AM, Yang, Zhiyong wrote: > > Hi Ferruh, > > > > The patch (ethdev: increase port_id range) tend to increase port id > > range in ethdev, not eventdev, Do you mean we should change eventdev port > id ? > > > > Before V2, that patchset includes eventdev port id extension. > > > > but Bruce reminded me about it in that patchset v2 thread and suggest > > to send a separate patch/patchset to fix it if required. So, I didn’t touch > > the > event related files after v2. > > > > If required, I can send eventdev port id range patch soon. > > Sorry I just copy-paste the command output without parsing. > > No we are not interested in eventdev ones, please ignore them, but in the list > there can be still ethdev related ones, you will need to check them first. > > Thanks, > ferruh
