Hello Gaetan,

On Monday 16 October 2017 07:12 PM, Gaëtan Rivet wrote:
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 05:12:37PM +0530, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
Hello Gaetan,

Please ignore this email (reason inline)


Hello Shreyansh,

Thanks for reading this patchset, and sorry about the confusion (the
previous cover-letter only listed the PCI bus move, the bus control was
only added in this version).

That's OK. I mixed up the cover-letters anyway.
Probably the complete series needs a rebase as some patches have changes exactly same locations in EAL where this patch impacts (at least for PCI movement patches, I found patches had fuzz factor)


I'd be very happy to see these series integrated for this release or the
next, and as such your opinion would matter a great deal.

I do understand the importance of this patch series - but I have not been able to devote enough time to this lately. Even now, I am not sure if I would be able to completely review all within 17.11 timeframe as it is quite big. (And I have some personal time-off coming up soon!)


However, I have found important issues that I am still working on with
the PCI bus move. I am trying to fix this in time, but I'm not sure yet
to succeed soon enough.

I understand.
It is a complex series - specially the build break in PCI movement on per patch basis - that would be difficult to solve. Probably that requires adding dummy functions/variables to allow compilation and then moving them out. It is indeed tough choice.


It would block the rest. I could still redo both series without the PCI
bus move but the bus control scheme is necessary for the devargs
cleanup.

Probably it is best to postpone for 18.02. It indeed is difficult to let a proposal fall through a planned release - but this work is really critical as it impacts a lot of people (PCI, Buses, args etc).
Just my personal opinion.


I don't know if this bus control scheme is interesting enough though.
I need additional opinions about it.

I haven't started reading the Bus control yet - I am still focusing on PCI movement and then I had planned the devargs. But, I will start looking into this as well. I would try to add whatever opinion I can.


Anyway, thanks,


Always welcome! But, that's what the community is for. :D

-
Shreyansh

Reply via email to