I talked with Akhil. I will send v3 of patches by EOD and hold back this
patch.
The reason I don't have time to deep dive regression tests and get back
with an example in the upcoming days.
Thanks!
On 10/23/2017 1:54 PM, De Lara Guarch, Pablo wrote:
Hi Aviad,
-----Original Message-----
From: Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 6:56 AM
To: avia...@dev.mellanox.co.il; dev@dpdk.org; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
<pablo.de.lara.gua...@intel.com>; avia...@mellanox.com
Cc: bor...@mellanox.com; akhil.go...@nxp.com;
hemant.agra...@nxp.com; Nicolau, Radu <radu.nico...@intel.com>;
Doherty, Declan <declan.dohe...@intel.com>; lir...@mellanox.com;
nelio.laranje...@6wind.com; tho...@monjalon.net
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev][PATCH v2 4/6] examples/ipsec-secgw: add correct
padding to tunnel mode
Hi Aviad,
I think you missed my question on v1 for this patch.
Could you provide an example where the pad calculation with the current
code is wrong?
Could you reply to the comments from Sergio and Radu?
We should try to get this merged ASAP.
Thanks,
Pablo
