> -----Original Message----- > From: Iremonger, Bernard > Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2017 9:41 AM > To: Thomas Monjalon <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; Yigit, Ferruh <[email protected]>; Ananyev, > Konstantin <[email protected]>; Dumitrescu, Cristian > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Singh, > Jasvinder <[email protected]>; Mcnamara, John > <[email protected]>; Iremonger, Bernard > <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/4] flow classification library > > Hi Thomas, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Monday, October 23, 2017 9:59 PM > > To: Iremonger, Bernard <[email protected]> > > Cc: [email protected]; Yigit, Ferruh <[email protected]>; Ananyev, > > Konstantin <[email protected]>; Dumitrescu, Cristian > > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Singh, > > Jasvinder <[email protected]>; Mcnamara, John > > <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/4] flow classification library > > > I suppose you are OK to wait one more release and call for more > reviewers? > > This library was not ready for 17.11.RC1 having received some comments > just before the RC1 deadline. > It was then targeted for RC2 and we have pulled out all the stops to get > it ready for RC2. > > It is now at v10 of the patch set, there have been no review comments from > the community (apart from Intel), since RFC v3. > > I think that there has been ample time for the community to review this > patch set, calling for more reviewers at this point is not helpful. > > The API's of the library are marked as experimental, so there will be no > issues with ABI breakage, if there are requests for changes later. > > I am not OK to wait one more release, I believe we have followed the > process correctly.
+1 for inclusion in RC2. John
