On 10/30/2017 6:07 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 6/21/2017 6:25 PM, jingjing.wu at intel.com (Wu, Jingjing) wrote:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: rsanford2 at gmail.com
>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2016 4:43 AM
>>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] testpmd: fix LACP ports to work with idle
>>> links
>>>
>>> Problem: When there is little or no TX traffic on an LACP port (bonding
>>> mode 4),
>>> we don't call its tx burst function in a timely manner, and thus we don't
>>> transmit LACPDUs when we should.
>>>
>>> Solution: Add and maintain an "lacp_master" flag in rte_port struct.
>>> In the main packet forwarding loop, if port is an LACP master, in 1 out of N
>>> loops force an empty call to the tx burst API.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Robert Sanford <rsanford at akamai.com>
>>> ---
>>> app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 9 +++++++++
>>> app/test-pmd/testpmd.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> app/test-pmd/testpmd.h | 4 ++++
>>> 3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c index
>>> f90befc..2a629ee 100644
>>> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>>> @@ -3975,6 +3975,10 @@ static void cmd_set_bonding_mode_parsed(void
>>> *parsed_result,
>>> /* Set the bonding mode for the relevant port. */
>>> if (0 != rte_eth_bond_mode_set(port_id, res->value))
>>> printf("\t Failed to set bonding mode for port = %d.\n",
>>> port_id);
>>> + else if (res->value == BONDING_MODE_8023AD)
>>> + set_port_lacp_master(port_id);
>>> + else
>>> + clear_port_lacp_master(port_id);
>>> }
>>>
>>> cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_setbonding_mode_set = @@ -4408,6
>>> +4412,11 @@ static void cmd_create_bonded_device_parsed(void
>>> *parsed_result,
>>> reconfig(port_id, res->socket);
>>> rte_eth_promiscuous_enable(port_id);
>>> ports[port_id].enabled = 1;
>>> +
>>> + if (res->mode == BONDING_MODE_8023AD)
>>> + set_port_lacp_master(port_id);
>>> + else
>>> + clear_port_lacp_master(port_id);
>>> }
>>>
>>> }
>>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c index
>>> 1428974..806667e 100644
>>> --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
>>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
>>> @@ -920,12 +920,28 @@ run_pkt_fwd_on_lcore(struct fwd_lcore *fc,
>>> packet_fwd_t pkt_fwd)
>>> struct fwd_stream **fsm;
>>> streamid_t nb_fs;
>>> streamid_t sm_id;
>>> + unsigned int loop_count = 0;
>>>
>>> fsm = &fwd_streams[fc->stream_idx];
>>> nb_fs = fc->stream_nb;
>>> do {
>>> for (sm_id = 0; sm_id < nb_fs; sm_id++)
>>> (*pkt_fwd)(fsm[sm_id]);
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Per rte_eth_bond.h, we must invoke LACP master's tx
>>> + * burst function at least once every 100 ms.
>>> + */
>>> + loop_count++;
>>> + if (likely(loop_count % 1024 != 0))
>>> + continue;
>>> + for (sm_id = 0; sm_id < nb_fs; sm_id++) {
>>> + struct fwd_stream *fs = fsm[sm_id];
>>> +
>>> + if (port_is_lacp_master(fs->tx_port))
>>> + rte_eth_tx_burst(fs->tx_port, fs->tx_queue,
>>> + NULL, 0);
>>> + }
>> By add tx_burst here will change default logic. Some fwd engine are usually
>> used to measure
>> Performance . Additional cycle in fast path may impact that. It would be
>> better to move additional
>> sending to your fwd engine.
>
> Hi Robert,
>
> This patchset is older than a year and not responded back to latest comments.
>
> Is this still a valid patch?
> Do you have any objection to remove this from patchwork?
Patches are updated as rejected.
>
> Thanks,
> ferruh
>
