> -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Radu Nicolau > Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 11:27 AM > To: Anoob Joseph <[email protected]>; Akhil Goyal > <[email protected]>; Doherty, Declan <[email protected]>; > Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio <[email protected]> > Cc: Narayana Prasad <[email protected]>; > Jerin Jacob <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix usage of > incorrect port > > > > On 12/12/2017 8:32 AM, Anoob Joseph wrote: > > When security offload is enabled, the packet should be forwarded on > > the port configured in the SA. Security session will be configured on > > that port only, and sending the packet on other ports could result in > > unencrypted packets being sent out. > > > > This would have performance improvements too, as the per packet LPM > > lookup would be avoided for IPsec packets, in inline mode. > > > > Fixes: ec17993a145a ("examples/ipsec-secgw: support security offload") > > > > Signed-off-by: Anoob Joseph <[email protected]> > > Acked-by: Akhil Goyal <[email protected]> > Acked-by: Radu Nicolau <[email protected]>
Applied to dpdk-next-crypto. Thanks, Pablo
