On 12/19/2017 6:38 PM, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
That's true, I commented too fast :)
And what about using mp->nb_mem_chunks instead? Would it do the job
in your use-case?
It should work. Let me check it out.
There is a slight problem with nb_mem_chunks.
It is getting incremented in the end of "rte_mempool_populate_phys",
while the elements are getting populated before it in the call of
mempool_add_elem.
I can use nb_mem_chunks are '0' check. However it can break in future if
mempool_populate_phys changes.
Thanks
Regards,
Hemant
