On 1/15/2018 7:29 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
15/01/2018 11:52, Guo, Jia:
On 1/15/2018 7:24 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
11/01/2018 15:05, Jeff Guo:
+enum rte_dev_subsystem {
+ RTE_DEV_SUBSYSTEM_UIO,
+ RTE_DEV_SUBSYSTEM_VFIO,
+ RTE_DEV_SUBSYSTEM_PCI,
+ RTE_DEV_SUBSYSTEM_MAX
+};
I don't think PCI and UIO/VFIO should be described at the same level.
Can you re-use the enum rte_kernel_driver?
rte_kernel_driver might be not qualify for that use, since that is the event
sumsystem, it include pci/uio/vfio, such strings to identify each subsystem. i
will modify it to be rte_dev_event_subsystem.
I don't understand this classification.
A device can be both PCI and VFIO.
yes , i think that might be a little strange, but what i saw in the
uevent message is that , the item of subsystem info from kernel side is
pci sometimes, but some time is uio, i don't know if it is good to
defferentiy them by "subsystem " or "driver" or other. let me think
about it more.
