> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nicolau, Radu
> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 4:13 PM
> To: Akhil Goyal <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> Cc: De Lara Guarch, Pablo <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] examples/ipsec-secgw: improve ipsec dequeue logic
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Akhil Goyal [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 7:19 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Cc: De Lara Guarch, Pablo <[email protected]>;
> > [email protected]; Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
> > <[email protected]>; Nicolau, Radu
> > <[email protected]>; Akhil Goyal <[email protected]>
> > Subject: [PATCH] examples/ipsec-secgw: improve ipsec dequeue logic
> >
> > Since the processing of crypto operations may take time due to
> > hardware offload, all the packets may not be available in the single
> dequeue command.
> > So it may happen that there is leakage of cops, and there is nobody to
> > dequeue the packets because dequeue of crypto ops is done only once
> > for a particular queue pair even if it has more packets in flight.
> >
> > This patch dequeue the packets again if the inflight packets are more
> > than the max packet burst.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Akhil Goyal <[email protected]>
> 
> Acked-by: Radu Nicolau <[email protected]>

Applied to dpdk-next-crypto.
Thanks,

Pablo

Reply via email to