> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net] > Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 10:56 AM > To: Van Haaren, Harry <harry.van.haa...@intel.com> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Varghese, Vipin <vipin.vargh...@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] eal: add function to release internal resources > > 29/01/2018 11:45, Harry van Haaren: > > --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/env_abstraction_layer.rst > > +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/env_abstraction_layer.rst > > +Finalizing and Cleanup > > +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > + > > +During the initialization of EAL resources such as hugepage backed memory > can be > > +allocated by core components. The memory allocated during > ``rte_eal_init()`` > > +can be released by calling the ``rte_eal_finalize()`` function. Refer to > the > > +API documentation for details. > > About naming, what is better between > rte_eal_finalize() and > rte_eal_cleanup() ? > I tend to think that "cleanup" is more descriptive.
Sure cleanup() is fine for me, I'll spin a v3 with the function name change.
