08/03/2018 15:38, Burakov, Anatoly: > On 08-Mar-18 12:12 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > Question: we are ok assuming that the socket numbers are sequential, or > > nearly so, and knowing the maximum socket number seen is a good > > approximation of the actual physical sockets? I know in terms of cores > > on a system, the core id's often jump - are there systems where the > > socket numbers do too? > > I am not aware of any system that would jump sockets like that. I'm open > to corrections, however :)
I think some IBM CPUs had this kind of jump in socket numbering. Chao?
