On 29/03/2018 7:13 AM, Shahaf Shuler wrote:
Hi Declan,
Thanks for the series! See some comments below
Wednesday, March 28, 2018 4:54 PM, Declan Doherty:
Subject: [dpdk-dev][PATCH v6 2/8] ethdev: add switch identifier parameter
to port
Introduces a new port attribute to ethdev port's which denotes the switch
domain a port belongs to. By default all port's switch identifiers are the their
port_id. Ports which share a common switch domain are configured with the
same switch id.
Signed-off-by: Declan Doherty <declan.dohe...@intel.com>
---
app/test-pmd/config.c | 1 +
lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c | 3 +++
lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h | 1 +
lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev_core.h | 1 +
4 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/app/test-pmd/config.c b/app/test-pmd/config.c index
4bb255c62..e12f8c515 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/config.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/config.c
@@ -517,6 +517,7 @@ port_infos_display(portid_t port_id)
printf("Min possible number of TXDs per queue: %hu\n",
dev_info.tx_desc_lim.nb_min);
printf("TXDs number alignment: %hu\n",
dev_info.tx_desc_lim.nb_align);
+ printf("Switch Id: %u\n", dev_info.switch_id);
}
void
diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
index 23857c91f..f32d18cad 100644
--- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
+++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
@@ -290,6 +290,8 @@ rte_eth_dev_allocate(const char *name)
eth_dev = eth_dev_get(port_id);
snprintf(eth_dev->data->name, sizeof(eth_dev->data->name),
"%s", name);
eth_dev->data->port_id = port_id;
+ eth_dev->data->switch_id = port_id;
+ /**< Default switch_id is the port_id of the device */
Why such default is needed? Why not let the PMD to set it always?
I saw this a simple way to have a consistent default value (the port_id)
for all PMDs, without the need to modify existing PMD which don't
currently have any concept of a switch domain.
Also taking the approach of just leaving it up to the PMD to decide the
value would mean that some form of synchronisation would be required so
that two device don't select the switch domain identifier.
eth_dev->data->mtu = ETHER_MTU;
unlock:
@@ -2395,6 +2397,7 @@ rte_eth_dev_info_get(uint16_t port_id, struct
rte_eth_dev_info *dev_info)
dev_info->driver_name = dev->device->driver->name;
dev_info->nb_rx_queues = dev->data->nb_rx_queues;
dev_info->nb_tx_queues = dev->data->nb_tx_queues;
+ dev_info->switch_id = dev->data->switch_id;
Why there is a need to keep the switch_id on device data?
I think PMD to store it on its private structure and report it in dev_info is
enough.
That way would require every PMD to be modified to maintain a switch_id
structure, which I know isn't a big deal, as only the device which need
to support it would need it, but we would need to change the
dev_info->switch_id from being a uint16_t to being a signed value so we
could have a default of -1 for device which don't support switch domain.
I thought the former approach was cleaner.
}
int
diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h
index 036153306..dced4fc41 100644
--- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h
+++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h
@@ -1029,6 +1029,7 @@ struct rte_eth_dev_info {
/** Configured number of rx/tx queues */
uint16_t nb_rx_queues; /**< Number of RX queues. */
uint16_t nb_tx_queues; /**< Number of TX queues. */
+ uint16_t switch_id; /**< Switch Domain Id */
};
/**
diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev_core.h
b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev_core.h
index e5681e466..caed7a4e6 100644
--- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev_core.h
+++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev_core.h
@@ -585,6 +585,7 @@ struct rte_eth_dev_data {
struct ether_addr* hash_mac_addrs;
/** Device Ethernet MAC addresses of hash filtering. */
uint16_t port_id; /**< Device [external] port identifier. */
+ uint16_t switch_id; /**< Switch which port is associated with
*/
__extension__
uint8_t promiscuous : 1, /**< RX promiscuous mode ON(1) / OFF(0).
*/
scattered_rx : 1, /**< RX of scattered packets is ON(1) /
OFF(0) */
--
2.14.3
