This patch fixes below build issue seen with some compilers
or build options:

lib/librte_vhost/fd_man.c: In function ‘fdset_pipe_read_cb’:
lib/librte_vhost/fd_man.c:284:2: error: ignoring return value of ‘read’, 
declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Werror=unused-result]
  read(readfd, charbuf, sizeof(charbuf));
  ^
lib/librte_vhost/fd_man.c: In function ‘fdset_pipe_notify’:
lib/librte_vhost/fd_man.c:324:2: error: ignoring return value of ‘write’, 
declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Werror=unused-result]
  write(fdset->u.writefd, "1", 1);
  ^

Reported-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybche...@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m....@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coque...@redhat.com>
---
 lib/librte_vhost/fd_man.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/fd_man.c b/lib/librte_vhost/fd_man.c
index ca1ba2622..1f9e22f96 100644
--- a/lib/librte_vhost/fd_man.c
+++ b/lib/librte_vhost/fd_man.c
@@ -281,7 +281,13 @@ fdset_pipe_read_cb(int readfd, void *dat __rte_unused,
                   int *remove __rte_unused)
 {
        char charbuf[16];
-       read(readfd, charbuf, sizeof(charbuf));
+       int r = read(readfd, charbuf, sizeof(charbuf));
+       /*
+        * Just an optimization, we don't care if read() failed
+        * so ignore explicitly its return value to make the
+        * compiler happy
+        */
+       RTE_SET_USED(r);
 }
 
 void
@@ -321,5 +327,12 @@ fdset_pipe_init(struct fdset *fdset)
 void
 fdset_pipe_notify(struct fdset *fdset)
 {
-       write(fdset->u.writefd, "1", 1);
+       int r = write(fdset->u.writefd, "1", 1);
+       /*
+        * Just an optimization, we don't care if read() failed
+        * so ignore explicitly its return value to make the
+        * compiler happy
+        */
+       RTE_SET_USED(r);
+
 }
-- 
2.14.3

Reply via email to