On 4/12/2018 1:02 AM, Junjie Chen wrote:
dev_start sets *dev_attached* after setup queues, this sets device to
invalid state since no frontend is attached. Also destroy_device set
*started* to zero which makes *allow_queuing* always zero until dev_start
get called again. Actually, we should not determine queues existence by
*dev_attached* but by queues pointers or other separated variable(s).
Fixes: 30a701a53737 ("net/vhost: fix crash when creating vdev
dynamically")
Signed-off-by: Junjie Chen <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Jens Freimann <[email protected]>
Overall, looks great to me except a nit below. Reviewed-by: Jianfeng Tan <[email protected]>
--- Changes in v3: - remove useless log in queue status showing Changes in v2: - use started to determine vhost queues readiness - revert setting started to zero in destroy_device drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c b/drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c index 11b6076..e392d71 100644 --- a/drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c +++ b/drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c @@ -528,10 +528,11 @@ update_queuing_status(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) unsigned int i; int allow_queuing = 1;- if (rte_atomic32_read(&internal->dev_attached) == 0)+ if (!dev->data->rx_queues || !dev->data->tx_queues) return;- if (rte_atomic32_read(&internal->started) == 0)+ if (rte_atomic32_read(&internal->started) == 0 || + rte_atomic32_read(&internal->dev_attached) == 0) allow_queuing = 0;/* Wait until rx/tx_pkt_burst stops accessing vhost device */@@ -607,13 +608,10 @@ new_device(int vid) #endifinternal->vid = vid;- if (eth_dev->data->rx_queues && eth_dev->data->tx_queues) { + if (rte_atomic32_read(&internal->started) == 1) queue_setup(eth_dev, internal); - rte_atomic32_set(&internal->dev_attached, 1); - } else { - RTE_LOG(INFO, PMD, "RX/TX queues have not setup yet\n"); - rte_atomic32_set(&internal->dev_attached, 0); - } + else + RTE_LOG(INFO, PMD, "RX/TX queues not exist yet\n");for (i = 0; i < rte_vhost_get_vring_num(vid); i++)rte_vhost_enable_guest_notification(vid, i, 0); @@ -622,6 +620,7 @@ new_device(int vid)eth_dev->data->dev_link.link_status = ETH_LINK_UP; + rte_atomic32_set(&internal->dev_attached, 1);update_queuing_status(eth_dev);RTE_LOG(INFO, PMD, "Vhost device %d created\n", vid);@@ -651,23 +650,24 @@ destroy_device(int vid) eth_dev = list->eth_dev; internal = eth_dev->data->dev_private;- rte_atomic32_set(&internal->started, 0);- update_queuing_status(eth_dev); rte_atomic32_set(&internal->dev_attached, 0); + update_queuing_status(eth_dev);eth_dev->data->dev_link.link_status = ETH_LINK_DOWN; - for (i = 0; i < eth_dev->data->nb_rx_queues; i++) {- vq = eth_dev->data->rx_queues[i]; - if (vq == NULL) - continue; - vq->vid = -1; - } - for (i = 0; i < eth_dev->data->nb_tx_queues; i++) { - vq = eth_dev->data->tx_queues[i]; - if (vq == NULL) - continue; - vq->vid = -1; + if (eth_dev->data->rx_queues && eth_dev->data->tx_queues) { + for (i = 0; i < eth_dev->data->nb_rx_queues; i++) { + vq = eth_dev->data->rx_queues[i]; + if (!vq) + continue; + vq->vid = -1; + } + for (i = 0; i < eth_dev->data->nb_tx_queues; i++) { + vq = eth_dev->data->tx_queues[i]; + if (!vq) + continue; + vq->vid = -1; + } }state = vring_states[eth_dev->data->port_id];@@ -792,11 +792,7 @@ eth_dev_start(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev) { struct pmd_internal *internal = eth_dev->data->dev_private;- if (unlikely(rte_atomic32_read(&internal->dev_attached) == 0)) {- queue_setup(eth_dev, internal); - rte_atomic32_set(&internal->dev_attached, 1); - } - + queue_setup(eth_dev, internal); rte_atomic32_set(&internal->started, 1); update_queuing_status(eth_dev);@@ -836,10 +832,13 @@ eth_dev_close(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)pthread_mutex_unlock(&internal_list_lock); rte_free(list);- for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_rx_queues; i++)- rte_free(dev->data->rx_queues[i]); - for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_tx_queues; i++) - rte_free(dev->data->tx_queues[i]); + if (dev->data->rx_queues)
This is implied that rx_queues is already allocated. So I don't think we need this.
+ for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_rx_queues; i++) + rte_free(dev->data->rx_queues[i]); + + if (dev->data->tx_queues) + for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_tx_queues; i++) + rte_free(dev->data->tx_queues[i]);rte_free(dev->data->mac_addrs);free(internal->dev_name);

