The memory region is [start, end), so if the memseg of 'end' isn't
allocated yet, the returned memseg will have zero entries and this will
make 'end' zero (nil).
Fixes: 718e35999c96 ("net/mlx5: use virt2memseg instead of iteration")
Cc: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.bura...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yongseok Koh <ys...@mellanox.com>
---
drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_mr.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_mr.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_mr.c
index fdf7b3e88..39bbe2481 100644
--- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_mr.c
+++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_mr.c
@@ -265,9 +265,7 @@ mlx5_mr_new(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct rte_mempool *mp)
ms = rte_mem_virt2memseg((void *)start, NULL);
if (ms != NULL)
start = RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR(start, ms->hugepage_sz);
- ms = rte_mem_virt2memseg((void *)end, NULL);
- if (ms != NULL)
- end = RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(end, ms->hugepage_sz);
+ end = RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(end, ms->hugepage_sz);
DRV_LOG(DEBUG,
"port %u mempool %p using start=%p end=%p size=%zu for memory"
--
2.11.0
