On 4/26/2018 4:50 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 4/26/2018 3:37 PM, Wei Dai wrote:
>> This patch check if a requested offloading is supported
>> in the device capability.
>> Any offloading is disabled by default if it is not set
>> in rte_eth_dev_configure( ) and rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup().
>> A per port offloading can only be enabled in
>> rte_eth_dev_configure(). If a per port offloading is
>> sent to rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( ), return error.
>> Only per queue offloading can be sent to
>> rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( ). A per queue offloading is
>> enabled only if it is enabled in rte_eth_dev_configure( ) OR
>> if it is enabled in rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( ).
>> If a per queue offloading is enabled in rte_eth_dev_configure(),
>> it can't be disabled in rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( ).
>> If a per queue offloading is disabled in rte_eth_dev_configure( ),
>> it can be enabled or disabled( ) in rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( ).
>>
>> This patch can make such checking in a common way in rte_ethdev
>> layer to avoid same checking in underlying PMD.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Dai <wei....@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c | 56 
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 56 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
>> index f0f53d4..5485f47 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
>> +++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
>> @@ -1196,6 +1196,28 @@ rte_eth_dev_configure(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t 
>> nb_rx_q, uint16_t nb_tx_q,
>>                                                      ETHER_MAX_LEN;
>>      }
>>  
>> +    /* Any requested offload must be within its device capability */
>> +    if ((local_conf.rxmode.offloads & dev_info.rx_offload_capa) !=
>> +         local_conf.rxmode.offloads) {
>> +            RTE_PMD_DEBUG_TRACE("ethdev port_id=%d requested Rx offloads "
>> +                                "0x%" PRIx64 " doesn't match Rx offloads "
>> +                                "capability 0x%" PRIx64 "\n",
>> +                                port_id,
>> +                                local_conf.rxmode.offloads,
>> +                                dev_info.rx_offload_capa);
>> +            return -EINVAL;
>> +    }
>> +    if ((local_conf.txmode.offloads & dev_info.tx_offload_capa) !=
>> +         local_conf.txmode.offloads) {
>> +            RTE_PMD_DEBUG_TRACE("ethdev port_id=%d requested Tx offloads "
>> +                                "0x%" PRIx64 " doesn't match Tx offloads "
>> +                                "capability 0x%" PRIx64 "\n",
>> +                                port_id,
>> +                                local_conf.txmode.offloads,
>> +                                dev_info.tx_offload_capa);
>> +            return -EINVAL;
>> +    }
>> +
>>      /*
>>       * Setup new number of RX/TX queues and reconfigure device.
>>       */
>> @@ -1547,6 +1569,23 @@ rte_eth_rx_queue_setup(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t 
>> rx_queue_id,
>>                                                  &local_conf.offloads);
>>      }
>>  
>> +    /*
>> +     * Only per-queue offload can be enabled from application.
>> +     * If any pure per-port offload is sent to this function, return -EINVAL
> 
> This comment doesn't match below check, below doesn't check pure per-port 
> offload
> 
>> +     */
>> +    if ((local_conf.offloads & dev_info.rx_queue_offload_capa) !=
>> +         local_conf.offloads) {> +          RTE_PMD_DEBUG_TRACE("Ethdev 
>> port_id=%d rx_queue_id=%d "
>> +                                "Requested offload 0x%" PRIx64 "doesn't "
>> +                                "match per-queue capability 0x%" PRIx64
>> +                                " in rte_eth_rx_queue_setup( )\n",
>> +                                port_id,
>> +                                rx_queue_id,
>> +                                local_conf.offloads,
>> +                                dev_info.rx_queue_offload_capa);
>> +            return -EINVAL;
>> +    }
> 
> Lets add one more check and consider this for rc1, later we can update checks
> for suggested API in rc2.
> 
> Check to add (this is for existing API)
> If a pure per-port update enabled configure, it should be enabled in
> queue_setup() as well.

According comment from Thomas, lets target directly rc2, new API. For that I
think we still need an update to this patch.

In previous version of this patch there was a comment to strip port_offloads
from requested offloads before passing vales to PMD.
Just to highlight not strip port_capability, but port_offloads set by 
configure()

The logic is if an offload set in configure(), both port level offload or queue
level offload, no need to duplicate it for PMD.

> 
> 
>> +
>>      ret = (*dev->dev_ops->rx_queue_setup)(dev, rx_queue_id, nb_rx_desc,
>>                                            socket_id, &local_conf, mp);
>>      if (!ret) {
>> @@ -1681,6 +1720,23 @@ rte_eth_tx_queue_setup(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t 
>> tx_queue_id,
>>                                        &local_conf.offloads);
>>      }
>>  
>> +    /*
>> +     * Only per-queue offload can be enabled from applcation.
>> +     * If any pure per-port offload is sent to this function, return -EINVAL
>> +     */
>> +    if ((local_conf.offloads & dev_info.tx_queue_offload_capa) !=
>> +         local_conf.offloads) {
>> +            RTE_PMD_DEBUG_TRACE("Ethdev port_id=%d tx_queue_id=%d "
>> +                                "Requested offload 0x%" PRIx64 "doesn't "
>> +                                "match per-queue capability 0x%" PRIx64
>> +                                " in rte_eth_tx_queue_setup( )\n",
>> +                                port_id,
>> +                                tx_queue_id,
>> +                                local_conf.offloads,
>> +                                dev_info.tx_queue_offload_capa);
>> +            return -EINVAL;
>> +    }
>> +
>>      return eth_err(port_id, (*dev->dev_ops->tx_queue_setup)(dev,
>>                     tx_queue_id, nb_tx_desc, socket_id, &local_conf));
>>  }
>>
> 

Reply via email to