It seems wrong to use one state ("IN PROGRESS") to mean two different
things.On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@apache.org> wrote: > Hey Everybody, > > INFRA-8766 has been pending for a while to improve our workflow and match > it to JIRA. It just got resolved so let's try to make sure that we fairly > represent the status of the issues. Among other things, this will help new > contributors understand what is going on. If we see additional things we > need, we can always request those things. > > The workflow can be seen at [1]. > > Here is my proposed mapping of the new workflow to our process. > > New bug starts in OPEN. > When someone starts working on it, they move it to IN PROGRESS. > When someone puts a patch up for review, move to REVIEWABLE > When a patch is reviewed and has pending changes, move to IN PROGRESS > When patch is +1'd, move to ACCEPTED > When a patch is merged, move to RESOLVED > When an issue is verified, move to CLOSED > When an issue is found to not be fixed, move to REOPENED > > Let me know if people think we should use these states or transitions > differently. > > thanks, > Jacques > > [1] > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12703522/Screen%20Shot%202015-03-09%20at%2022.41.34.png >
