Here are some brief notes I took during the hangout:

Attendees: Chris, Jacques, Byron, Parth, Sudheesh, Daniel, Hakim, Jim

Jacques: release schedule for the rest of the summer
proposes the 15th of each month for the next couple of months

Chris: I'd like to move to 6 weeks

It hasn't really been exactly 4 weeks yet anyway.

Propose a strategy around bug tagging in a more open way.
Until we have a strong commitment to do something, we should leave them as
"Future."

Constantly pushing bugs into a future release seems like a poor use of
people's
time.

Parth: the problem with the future list, is it might just be a big dead
bucket.

Jacques asked about the state of the new buffer allocator...
Chris: I'm almost done with some changes that eliminate locking in favor
of transacted changes via a swap of an AtomicReference<> to an object that
holds the state-tracking variables; this is an optimistic locking scheme
that
doesn't span allocators; transfers between allocators cause local
"transactions"
within each allocator.

Jacques wants to get back to some old RPC tickets.

Is the recycler worth using for the allocator?
Jacques general rule: avoid objects for values within batches, but not for
record batches themselves.

Discussion of the use of the new serializing executor to deliver events to
fragment executors.

Hakim: we need to do some work with Parquet so we can catch up to them, and
so
they can take back our patches.

Parth: we're moving forward with Calcite in order to be current on that as
well.


On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Chris Westin <[email protected]>
wrote:

> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/event/ci4rdiju8bv04a64efj5fedd0lc
>

Reply via email to