-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36292/#review91027
-----------------------------------------------------------



exec/java-exec/src/test/java/org/apache/drill/exec/physical/impl/flatten/TestFlatten.java
 (line 65)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/36292/#comment144255>

    I am not sure how different flatten is planned as it is a UDF looking 
operator. However, should we not flatten the same field at least twice to test 
this patch?


- Hanifi Gunes


On July 8, 2015, 5:44 a.m., Jason Altekruse wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/36292/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 8, 2015, 5:44 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for drill and Hanifi Gunes.
> 
> 
> Bugs: DRILL-2838
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-2838
> 
> 
> Repository: drill-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This issue was fixed for project recently, it relates to imcomplete schema 
> population. I applied the same fix to the flatten operator. I tried to get 
> some intial work done on refactoring to more appropriately share code between 
> flatten and project. This is a bit large in scope, so I have added a new JIRA 
> to track this https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-3471
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/physical/impl/flatten/FlattenRecordBatch.java
>  491ced3 
>   
> exec/java-exec/src/test/java/org/apache/drill/exec/physical/impl/flatten/TestFlatten.java
>  39e36eb 
>   
> exec/java-exec/src/test/resources/flatten/complex_transaction_example_data_modified.json
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> exec/java-exec/src/test/resources/flatten/complex_transaction_repeated_map_double_copy_baseline.json
>  PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/36292/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Testing in progress, relevent related unit tests are passing
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jason Altekruse
> 
>

Reply via email to