>Does anyone have a patch for the current test problem, so I could address >that in the meantime?
We're not sure what you are talking about. Can you expound? -- Jacques Nadeau CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Edmon Begoli <[email protected]> wrote: > My build without tests is doing fine. No problems there. > > I will wait for Andrew to break the unit testing up. > > Does anyone have a patch for the current test problem, so I could address > that in the meantime? > > On Sunday, August 30, 2015, Jacques Nadeau <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Andrew is actively working on breaking up the tests. Hopefully he'll have > > something to report soon. > > > > On the build problem, please share more details. > > > > -- > > Jacques Nadeau > > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio > > > > On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected] > > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Edmon Begoli <[email protected] > > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > > > This might be already in motion, but let me discuss it with you > > > > nevertheless: > > > > > > > > - could we break up the testing configuration so that small, atomic > > unit > > > > tests can be always ran by default > > > > > > > > > > Specific tests can already be run separately. > > > > > > There is no wholesale separation into small and large tests > currently. I > > > think that there is an effort underway to do something quite similar to > > > that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - create larger configurations for complex unit and integration > testing > > > so > > > > we can run them independently, if needed > > > > > > > > > > As above. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Finally, can someone point me at that patch that fixes current test > > > problem > > > > locally. > > > > > > > > > > Which version of Java do you have? There is a known problem with a few > > > tests on Java 8. > > > > > > What precise problem are you seeing? > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would make me more comfortable being able to run full builds with > > > tests. > > > > > > > > > > Indeed. > > > > > >
