Got it. Makes sense. On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@dremio.com> wrote:
> On (3), my thought is that they plan on commencing in the next couple > weeks, (not that they have to complete by then). The fix for tag tells > others how long they it will take. If someone wants it faster, they should > chime in to help out. > > -- > Jacques Nadeau > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Edmon Begoli <ebeg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Sounds good to me. > > > > I would only comment that we should probably relax item 3 to tie the > > commitment to the release schedule. > > There might be issues that cannot be worked on within few weeks, but are > > good to keep planned for the future few releases ahead. > > > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > Hey Everybody, > > > > > > As more and more people are starting to work on JIRAs, I'd like to > > propose > > > a new process around jira assignment, targeting, etc. This way people > > will > > > be able to more easily identify available issues for pick up and > general > > > development intentions. > > > > > > I propose the following: > > > > > > 1. We should remove the default assignment of new issues. > > > 2. We need to remove all current assignments other than those that > are > > > currently active (or about to be active). > > > 3. Individual developers who plan to work on a feature should assign > > it > > > to themselves. This should be a commitment to work on this feature > > > within > > > the next couple weeks. (They should also set the "fix for" to the > > > release > > > they would like to target completion.) > > > 4. Once a developer starts work on a feature, they should accept the > > > feature (showing that they are actively working on it). > > > 5. If another developer is interested in working on a feature that > is > > > assigned (but inactive), they should request taking over that > feature > > > from > > > the current assignee. > > > > > > How does this sound? > > > > > > Jacques > > > > > >
