DRILL-1065 and 3884 have been merged to master. Remaining issues for 1.2: DRILL-2879 Add Remaining portion of "Drill extended json's support $oid" DRILL-3887 Parquet metadata cache not being used (regression caused by DRILL-3788) DRILL-2361 Column aliases cannot include dots
Any idea when those patches will be merged into master ? Thanks On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Aman Sinha <asi...@maprtech.com> wrote: > If no one has objections, I would like to merge Adam's patch for DRILL-2361 > (Column aliases cannot include dots). This has been reviewed and tested. > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Abdel Hakim Deneche <adene...@maprtech.com > > > wrote: > > > DRILL-1065 is ready to be merged, I'm running the final unit tests right > > now. > > > > How about we set the cutoff to tomorrow 5pm pacific time ? any patch that > > isn't in master by then won't be part of 1.2 ? > > > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@dremio.com> > wrote: > > > > > We went through the list. I propose that we include only the following > > > issues in 1.2 and move the rest to 1.3 > > > > > > DRILL-1065 Provide a reset command to reset an option to its default > > value > > > DRILL-3884 Hive native scan has lower parallelization leading to > > > performance degradation > > > DRILL-2879 Add Remaining portion of "Drill extended json's support > $oid" > > > DRILL-3887 Parquet metadata cache not being used (regression caused by > > > DRILL-3788) > > > > > > What do other people think? > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Jacques Nadeau > > > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@dremio.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > I'm on: > > > > > > > > https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/event/ci4rdiju8bv04a64efj5fedd0lc > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Jacques Nadeau > > > > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@dremio.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> How about now? > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> Jacques Nadeau > > > >> CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio > > > >> > > > >> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Parth Chandra <par...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> What time do you want the hangout? I'm in favour of bumping if we > > > cannot > > > >>> get decided by tomorrow. > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@dremio.com > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Abdel Hakim Deneche < > > > >>> > adene...@maprtech.com> > > > >>> > wrote: > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > I can manage the release. > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > Great! I use a manual variation of these steps [1] typically. > > Julian > > > >>> Hyde > > > >>> > made a much nicer set of steps (for Incubator) here: [2] if you > > want > > > >>> to use > > > >>> > those. > > > >>> > > > > >>> > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Parth Chandra <par...@apache.org > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > +1 on the release. I'm all for starting the process ASAP. > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > I've moved all the non-critical, non-active jiras out of 1.2. > > > However, > > > >>> that > > > >>> > still leaves 63 issues open. Do you want to do a quick hangout to > > try > > > >>> to > > > >>> > figure what we really want to include versus bump? > > > >>> > > > > >>> > J > > > >>> > > > > >>> > [1] > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > > > https://gist.github.com/jacques-n/be0d2f584171d832aedb#file-release_commands > > > >>> > [2] > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > > > https://calcite.incubator.apache.org/docs/howto.html#making-a-release-for-calcite-committers > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Abdel Hakim Deneche < > > > >>> > adene...@maprtech.com > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > wrote: > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > I can manage the release. > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Aman Sinha < > > asi...@maprtech.com > > > > > > > >>> > wrote: > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > +1 for starting the process of finalizing the 1.2 release > and > > > >>> 'bounce > > > >>> > > > > everything not critical (and not in-progress or reviewable) > > off > > > >>> of > > > >>> > this > > > >>> > > > > release'. > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > Aman > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Jacques Nadeau < > > > >>> jacq...@dremio.com> > > > >>> > > > > wrote: > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > Hey All, > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > It seems like we should finalize on the 1.2 release > pretty > > > >>> soon. I > > > >>> > > > > > currently see something like 174 bugs currently open. Of > > > >>> those, ~20 > > > >>> > > are > > > >>> > > > > > reviewable and ~20 are in progress. I'm inclined to > bounce > > > >>> > everything > > > >>> > > > not > > > >>> > > > > > critical (and not in-progress or reviewable) off of this > > > >>> release. > > > >>> > Any > > > >>> > > > > > thoughts on when everyone would like to do a release? > Also, > > > >>> anyone > > > >>> > > want > > > >>> > > > > to > > > >>> > > > > > be release manager? > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > Jacques > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > -- > > > >>> > > > > > Jacques Nadeau > > > >>> > > > > > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 7:58 PM, Parth Chandra < > > > >>> par...@apache.org> > > > >>> > > > > wrote: > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > A couple of reasons - > > > >>> > > > > > > a) We definitely need more QA time for the features > > that > > > >>> are > > > >>> > > ready. > > > >>> > > > > > > b) Some features, in particular, Parquet metadata > > caching > > > >>> > > (Steven) > > > >>> > > > > and > > > >>> > > > > > > Faster Hive reads (Jason) are close enough to > completion > > > >>> that we > > > >>> > > > really > > > >>> > > > > > > should include them. Again the team could use the extra > > > time > > > >>> to > > > >>> > QA > > > >>> > > > > these. > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Chris Westin < > > > >>> > > > chriswesti...@gmail.com > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > wrote: > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > Unfortunately, we've had to modify our plans, and are > > now > > > >>> > > thinking > > > >>> > > > of > > > >>> > > > > > > > aiming for a vote on September 10th. > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Chris Westin < > > > >>> > > > > chriswesti...@gmail.com > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > We were thinking of targetting for a vote on August > > > 26th. > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Jacques Nadeau < > > > >>> > > > > jacq...@dremio.com> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> Following up since we haven't discussed the 1.2 > > > release > > > >>> in a > > > >>> > > > > while. > > > >>> > > > > > > How > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> are people feeling about trying to get a candidate > > out > > > >>> in > > > >>> > the > > > >>> > > > next > > > >>> > > > > > > week > > > >>> > > > > > > > or > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> two? > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> thanks, > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> Jacques > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> -- > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> Jacques Nadeau > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > From: Parth Chandra <pchan...@maprtech.com> > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > Date: Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 11:29 AM > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > Subject: Re: Timing for 1.2 release, ideas > around > > > >>> things > > > >>> > to > > > >>> > > > > > include > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > To: dev@drill.apache.org > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > I just moved DRILL-3201 to 1.2. It's one of the > > > >>> candidates > > > >>> > > for > > > >>> > > > > > > > inclusion > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > into 1.2 > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 7:04 AM, < > > > >>> > michael.engl...@nomura.com > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > wrote: > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > I'm not sure what the appetite is for pushing > > this > > > >>> into > > > >>> > > 1.2 > > > >>> > > > vs > > > >>> > > > > > the > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > planned > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > 1.3, but Drill UI Authentication would be > really > > > >>> great > > > >>> > for > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > companies/users > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > that run multi-tenant Hadoop clusters with > > Drill. > > > >>> At the > > > >>> > > > > moment > > > >>> > > > > > > any > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> user > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > can change storage plugins and cancel running > > > >>> queries, > > > >>> > > even > > > >>> > > > if > > > >>> > > > > > > they > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> did > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > not > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > submit them. This is a bit of a blocker for > > Drill > > > on > > > >>> > > > > > multi-tenant > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > production clusters for now. > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > JIRA link: > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-3201 > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > -----Original Message----- > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > From: Jacques Nadeau [mailto: > jacq...@apache.org > > ] > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > Sent: 08 July 2015 17:19 > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > To: dev@drill.apache.org > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > Subject: Timing for 1.2 release, ideas around > > > >>> things to > > > >>> > > > > include > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > Hey Guys, > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > What do you think about planning the 1.2 > feature > > > >>> cutoff > > > >>> > > > around > > > >>> > > > > > Aug > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> 21st > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > and target a release vote a week or so after > > that? > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > What are different features people want to get > > > into > > > >>> 1.2? > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > Here are couple of things that I'd like to > help > > > >>> > facilitate > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> contribution > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > and/or inclusion: > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > - Mongo improvements (including extended type > > > fixes > > > >>> > 2879 , > > > >>> > > > > test > > > >>> > > > > > > > cases > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > 1666, > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > etc) > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > - httpd log parser format plugin (3423) > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > - rpc enhancements (local 2941 and off-thread > > > 3242) > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > - First merge of Magnus' JDBC connector (3180) > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > - New allocator (1942) > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > Other key goals? What do people think about > the > > > >>> > proposed > > > >>> > > > > > timing? > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > This e-mail (including any attachments) is > > private > > > >>> and > > > >>> > > > > > > confidential, > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> may > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > contain proprietary or privileged information > > and > > > is > > > >>> > > > intended > > > >>> > > > > > for > > > >>> > > > > > > > the > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > named > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > recipient(s) only. Unintended recipients are > > > >>> strictly > > > >>> > > > > prohibited > > > >>> > > > > > > > from > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > taking action on the basis of information in > > this > > > >>> e-mail > > > >>> > > and > > > >>> > > > > > must > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> contact > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > the sender immediately, delete this e-mail > (and > > > all > > > >>> > > > > attachments) > > > >>> > > > > > > and > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > destroy any hard copies. Nomura will not > accept > > > >>> > > > responsibility > > > >>> > > > > > or > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > liability > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > for the accuracy or completeness of, or the > > > >>> presence of > > > >>> > > any > > > >>> > > > > > virus > > > >>> > > > > > > or > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > disabling code in, this e-mail. If > verification > > is > > > >>> > sought > > > >>> > > > > please > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> request > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > a > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > hard copy. Any reference to the terms of > > executed > > > >>> > > > transactions > > > >>> > > > > > > > should > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> be > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > treated as preliminary only and subject to > > formal > > > >>> > written > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> confirmation by > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > Nomura. Nomura reserves the right to retain, > > > >>> monitor and > > > >>> > > > > > intercept > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> e-mail > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > communications through its networks (subject > to > > > and > > > >>> in > > > >>> > > > > > accordance > > > >>> > > > > > > > with > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > applicable laws). No confidentiality or > > privilege > > > is > > > >>> > > waived > > > >>> > > > or > > > >>> > > > > > > lost > > > >>> > > > > > > > by > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > Nomura by any mistransmission of this e-mail. > > Any > > > >>> > > reference > > > >>> > > > to > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> "Nomura" > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > is > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > a reference to any entity in the Nomura > > Holdings, > > > >>> Inc. > > > >>> > > > group. > > > >>> > > > > > > Please > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> read > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > our Electronic Communications Legal Notice > which > > > >>> forms > > > >>> > > part > > > >>> > > > of > > > >>> > > > > > > this > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > e-mail: > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > http://www.Nomura.com/email_disclaimer.htm > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > -- > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > Abdelhakim Deneche > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > Software Engineer > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > <http://www.mapr.com/> > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > Now Available - Free Hadoop On-Demand Training > > > >>> > > > < > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > > > http://www.mapr.com/training?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=Signature&utm_campaign=Free%20available > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Abdelhakim Deneche > > > > Software Engineer > > > > <http://www.mapr.com/> > > > > > > Now Available - Free Hadoop On-Demand Training > > < > > > http://www.mapr.com/training?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=Signature&utm_campaign=Free%20available > > > > > > -- Abdelhakim Deneche Software Engineer <http://www.mapr.com/> Now Available - Free Hadoop On-Demand Training <http://www.mapr.com/training?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=Signature&utm_campaign=Free%20available>
