Kasper,

Are you interested in working on a Drill metamodel format plugin? That way,
anything that Metamodel exposes would be available in Drill. It seems like
this would add great value to many users.

Jacques

--
Jacques Nadeau
CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Kasper Sørensen <
i.am.kasper.soren...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Ted,
>
> Actually in MetaModel you then have two choices with your mapping to table
> format.
>
> 1) Either map the "item" as the granularity of a record. That way you will
> get three rows - one for each item. On the last of the two rows you would
> have the same values for any element that is registered at the <record>
> scope.
>
> 2) You can also map 2 tables instead - one for <record> and one for <item>
> and then join them as you like.
>
>
> 2015-10-18 20:24 GMT+02:00 Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Kasper,
> >
> > This might work.
> >
> > One issue that I see is that Metamodel seems to take a very XML centric
> > view of things while Drill takes a pretty JSON view of things.
> >
> > The point at which I think that this might cause problems is that Drill
> > currently has troubles when it sees a records like
> >
> > <record><item>1</item></record>
> > <record><item>2</item><item>3</item></record>
> >
> > This is fine as far as XML is concerned, but if you think about it in
> terms
> > of JSON, it is probably best to view these records as
> >
> > {"item":[1]}
> > {"item":[2,3]}
> >
> > Unfortunately, from the first record, there is no way to tell that it
> > should not be viewed as
> >
> > {"item":1}
> >
> > Do you have a suggestion that would help with this?
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Kasper Sørensen <
> > i.am.kasper.soren...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi there,
> > >
> > > Sorry for barging in, but maybe this is a place where Drill and
> MetaModel
> > > could benefit from each other? We've considered that before at least
> ...
> > >
> > > MetaModel already has support for both DOM and SAX based XML querying.
> > They
> > > basically inherit some characteristics from DOM and SAX respectively:
> > >
> > >  - In the DOM variant we can infer a schema and all the user has to do
> is
> > > select a XML file/resource anywhere.
> > >  - In the SAX variant the user has to specify which paths in the XML
> > > document should represent logical "tables" and what paths represent
> their
> > > columns.
> > >
> > > See [1] for more info. Hope this might be of interest to integrate into
> > > Drill?
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Kasper Sørensen (from the MetaModel project)
> > >
> > > [1] http://wiki.apache.org/metamodel/examples/XmlTableMapping
> > >
> > > 2015-10-18 0:35 GMT+02:00 Magnus Pierre <mpie...@maprtech.com>:
> > >
> > > > Well, very few lines of code imho. And simple. Been able to parse
> > pretty
> > > > deep structures with no issues so far. Performance? 10-15 5mb xml's
> in
> > > less
> > > > than a second on my laptop but then I run it using Storm with some
> > > > parallelism in place. Don't know if it's good or bad. I'll share the
> > code
> > > > next time I use computer. You don't need to use it, but it works at
> > > least.
> > > >
> > > > /M
> > > > Den 17 okt 2015 10:43 em skrev "Matt Burgess" <mattyb...@gmail.com>:
> > > >
> > > > > If the converter is clean and performant then I'm sure the
> community
> > > > > (including me) is interested :)
> > > > >
> > > > > However I wonder if Drill can afford to add a translation layer
> > between
> > > > > data formats, could we be better served with similar parsing in
> Drill
> > > for
> > > > > XML as we do for JSON, or can it be pushed down far enough (to the
> > > > parser)
> > > > > to not make a noticeable difference (which is what I think Julian
> is
> > > > > implying)?
> > > > >
> > > > > Sent from my iPhone
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Oct 17, 2015, at 1:41 PM, Magnus Pierre <mpie...@maprtech.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Just wrote a simple sax implementation that converts xml to json
> > and
> > > > that
> > > > > > is able to deal with decently complex xml's, that I currently use
> > in
> > > > > Storm.
> > > > > > Takes attributes, and everything.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I can share it with the community if interesting.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > /Magnus
> > > > > > Den 17 okt 2015 7:02 em skrev "Julian Hyde" <
> jul...@hydromatic.net
> > >:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Seems to me the biggest problem is to make drill understand the
> > > nested
> > > > > >> structure of an xml document. That work has been done for json,
> so
> > > > let's
> > > > > >> build on it. Suppose there was a translator that converted xml
> to
> > > json
> > > > > >> (adding attributes for things that json lacks, such as
> namespaces,
> > > > text,
> > > > > >> element tags). Drill knows how to handle json, even if it is a
> bit
> > > > > verbose.
> > > > > >> The translator could be applied on the fly.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Julian
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Sent from my iPad
> > > > > >>>> On Oct 16, 2015, at 2:31 PM, Stefán Baxter <
> > > > ste...@activitystream.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Hi,
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> It's not possible but there has been some talk here about
> > > supporting
> > > > > it.
> > > > > >>> If I remember correctly it's rather complicated and not really
> > > > > feasible.
> > > > > >>> (I'm just a newbie so don't take my words for it)
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Regards,
> > > > > >>> -Stefan
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Daniel Ajo <
> > > > > daniel....@abarcahealth.com
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> Hey there,
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> I was wondering if it is possible to query XML files using
> > Apache
> > > > > Drill?
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> I see there are several formats, and maybe it would work using
> > an
> > > > > xpath
> > > > > >>>> query of some sorts, but just wondering if it would work to
> > > directly
> > > > > >> query
> > > > > >>>> it using some sort of plug-in.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Well, let me know,
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Daniel Ajo
> > > > > >>>> *********************************************************
> > > > > >> CONFIDENTIALITY
> > > > > >>>> NOTE: This electronic transmission contains information
> > belonging
> > > to
> > > > > >> Abarca
> > > > > >>>> Health LLC, which is confidential or legally privileged. If
> you
> > > are
> > > > > not
> > > > > >> the
> > > > > >>>> intended recipient, please immediately advise the sender by
> > reply
> > > > > >> e-mail or
> > > > > >>>> telephone that this message has been inadvertently transmitted
> > to
> > > > you
> > > > > >> and
> > > > > >>>> delete this e-mail from your system. If you have received this
> > > > > >> transmission
> > > > > >>>> in error, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
> copying,
> > > > > >>>> distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the
> > > contents
> > > > > of
> > > > > >> the
> > > > > >>>> information is strictly prohibited.
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to