Github user jaltekruse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/214#discussion_r42684543
--- Diff:
protocol/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/proto/beans/CoreOperatorType.java
---
@@ -58,7 +58,8 @@
HBASE_SUB_SCAN(33),
WINDOW(34),
NESTED_LOOP_JOIN(35),
- AVRO_SUB_SCAN(36);
+ AVRO_SUB_SCAN(36),
--- End diff --
I think the queries may run fine, but the use of this protobuf definition
if I'm not mistaken is to generate query profiles. If you don't return a value
that Drill knows about from the method getReaderOperatorType(), then the
operator type will show up as unknown in the profile. I should have been
clearer, my comment was more a question to @StevenMPhillips and @jacques-n. I
think we may need to refactor this interface to just return a String and not
use the protobuf enum, or have a separate "notes" field if we want to have a
generic filescan operator ID in this enum with extra data to say what kind of
scan we used.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
