The ByteBuffer changes have been officially merged into mainline Parquet. Anyone with interest in looking at the corresponding changes on the Drill side can go take a look at my JIRA I posted earlier in the thread.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Abdel Hakim Deneche <[email protected]> wrote: > I should be able to merge DRILL-3952 later today, I'm doing a final rebase > and running the tests one more time. > > Thanks > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Jason Altekruse <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I have posted a PR for the Drill side of my work to get us off of the > > parquet fork. The issue Jacques linked was previously closed when we got > > our fork back in sync with master, but we hadn't actually gotten merged > > back in, as such I have created a new JIRA. I have gone through a long > > review cycle with Julien to work our ByteBuffer modifications into > Parquet > > mainline and he is ready to merge the branch as soon as I have a > successful > > run of the Drill regression suite (hopefully within the hour). If you are > > available to review the changes to the Drill code needed to support the > > small API changes after integrating our work back into mainline please > see > > the JIRA below. > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4028 > > > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Jim Scott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > DRILL-3423 pull request is in. > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Jacques Nadeau <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hey All, > > > > Would like to start the vote today or tomorrow. I still would like to > > > get a > > > > few straggling patches in if possible. > > > > > > > > I'm hoping the following issues get closed out today: > > > > > > > > DRILL-971 (CSV Headers) > > > > DRILL-3963 (Sequence File) > > > > DRILL-1410 (Parquet fork) > > > > DRILL-3793 (RecordIterator) > > > > DRILL-3796 (Fix wrong result in merge join) > > > > > > > > I also saw an apparent regression in MSSQL plugin functionality so > I'll > > > be > > > > taking a quick look at that. > > > > > > > > I know that Jim was also looking at the HTTPD format plugin > > (DRILL-3423) > > > so > > > > I'm holding out hope that he has an updated (and mergeable patch) > > today. > > > > > > > > Any last things we'd like to get in before we generate a release > > > candidate? > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > Jacques > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Jacques Nadeau > > > > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Jacques Nadeau <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Great, thanks for you flexibility! > > > > > > > > > > I think this will be very helpful to the people struggling with > some > > of > > > > > the jdbc issues right now. > > > > > > > > > > One other nice thing is that this will get Julien's changes out to > > > users. > > > > > It wasn't mentioned in the jira but his changes should make > embedded > > > mode > > > > > startup 2-3 seconds faster. > > > > > On Oct 28, 2015 5:25 PM, "Parth Chandra" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> No one else seems to have an opinion :) > > > > >> > > > > >> Let's go with the monthly cycle with the vote going out at the > > > beginning > > > > >> of > > > > >> the month starting with the 1.3 release. > > > > >> > > > > >> Let's also make sure we stick to this cycle for all future > releases. > > > > >> > > > > >> Parth > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Jacques Nadeau < > [email protected] > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> > Hey Parth, > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Unfortunately, I didn't see the notes earlier or I could have > > > provided > > > > >> > feedback earlier. We've been talking about doing monthly > > time-bound > > > > >> > releases for some time and since the last release was started at > > the > > > > >> > beginning of the month, our expectation was that 1.3 would be at > > the > > > > >> > beginning of November. There are a number of issues that we see > > > people > > > > >> > hitting that we should be able to resolve around the JDBC plugin > > > this > > > > >> week > > > > >> > thus our desire to start the vote next week. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > How does that sound? > > > > >> > > > > > >> > thanks! > > > > >> > Jacques > > > > >> > > > > > >> > -- > > > > >> > Jacques Nadeau > > > > >> > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio > > > > >> > > > > > >> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Parth Chandra < > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > >> > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > I remember that the we settled on sending out for vote on the > > > 12th. > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > Minutes from the hangout : > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1o2GvZUtJvKzN013JdM715ZBzhseT0VyZ9WgmLMeeUUk/edit#heading=h.wlenwxcj8f7t > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Jacques Nadeau < > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > >> > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > I thought we talked about the middle of each month and then > > you > > > > >> > suggested > > > > >> > > > moving to the beginning of the month as that is easier to > > > > >> remember. Of > > > > >> > > > course I can't find the thread about this. > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > My preference would be get going start-of-month time-bound > > > > releases > > > > >> > > > starting next week unless you have a big concern. Sound > okay? > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > -- > > > > >> > > > Jacques Nadeau > > > > >> > > > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Parth Chandra < > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > >> > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > No problem with moving to the monthly cycle, but I thought > > > that > > > > we > > > > >> > were > > > > >> > > > > going to target the 12th of each month as the vote date. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Jacques Nadeau < > > > > >> [email protected] > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Hey Guys, > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > We talked about moving to a start of month release cycle > > and > > > > >> we're > > > > >> > > > > > approaching a start of month. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > I'd like to volunteer for the next release and target > next > > > > week > > > > >> as > > > > >> > a > > > > >> > > > > target > > > > >> > > > > > voting period. Let's see what we can get merged this > week > > > and > > > > >> then > > > > >> > > use > > > > >> > > > > the > > > > >> > > > > > Sat - Tues for stabilization. (Target vote on Tuesday > > > > >> afternoon.) > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Let me know your thoughts. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Jacques > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > *Jim Scott* > > > Director, Enterprise Strategy & Architecture > > > +1 (347) 746-9281 > > > @kingmesal <https://twitter.com/kingmesal> > > > > > > <http://www.mapr.com/> > > > [image: MapR Technologies] <http://www.mapr.com> > > > > > > Now Available - Free Hadoop On-Demand Training > > > < > > > > > > http://www.mapr.com/training?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=Signature&utm_campaign=Free%20available > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Abdelhakim Deneche > > Software Engineer > > <http://www.mapr.com/> > > > Now Available - Free Hadoop On-Demand Training > < > http://www.mapr.com/training?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=Signature&utm_campaign=Free%20available > > >
