Github user sudheeshkatkam commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/442#discussion_r58482936
--- Diff: exec/rpc/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/rpc/RpcBus.java ---
@@ -159,19 +159,15 @@ public ChannelClosedHandler(C clientConnection,
Channel channel) {
@Override
public void operationComplete(ChannelFuture future) throws Exception {
String msg;
- if(local!=null) {
+ if(local != null) {
msg = String.format("Channel closed %s <--> %s.", local, remote);
}else{
msg = String.format("Channel closed %s <--> %s.",
future.channel().localAddress(), future.channel().remoteAddress());
}
- if (RpcBus.this.isClient()) {
- if(local != null) {
- logger.info(String.format(msg));
- }
- } else {
- queue.channelClosed(new ChannelClosedException(msg));
- }
+ logger.info(msg); // should we leave this at info level ?
+
+ queue.channelClosed(new ChannelClosedException(msg),
future.channel());
clientConnection.close();
--- End diff --
Slightly unrelated: is this `clientConnection.close();` call unnecessary,
since this listener is meant to handle the underlying channel closure?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
