Github user amansinha100 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/519#discussion_r70002787
--- Diff:
exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/planner/logical/partition/PruneScanRule.java
---
@@ -269,13 +283,54 @@ protected void doOnMatch(RelOptRuleCall call, Filter
filterRel, Project projectR
int recordCount = 0;
int qualifiedCount = 0;
- // Inner loop: within each batch iterate over the
PartitionLocations
- for(PartitionLocation part: partitions){
- if(!output.getAccessor().isNull(recordCount) &&
output.getAccessor().get(recordCount) == 1){
- newPartitions.add(part);
- qualifiedCount++;
+ if (checkForSingle &&
+ partitions.get(0).isCompositePartition() /* apply single
partition check only for composite partitions */) {
+ // Inner loop: within each batch iterate over the
PartitionLocations
+ for (PartitionLocation part : partitions) {
--- End diff --
@jinfengni I started doing the refactoring to move this particular
optimization into a partition descriptor specific class. However, I was having
to propagate several internal states to the doSinglePartOpt() method...such as
partition map, the referenced dirs bitset , the value vector array and others.
Also, since this optimization occurs inside an outer loop, it is not
straightforward without doing a broader restructuring of the
PruneScanRule.doOnMatch() method. Would you be ok to defer this refactoring to
an enhancement JIRA ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
