Out of the 17 requested tickets, we resolved 13 over the week, and 4 have been deferred (DRILL-4280, DRILL-4858, DRILL-4370, DRILL-4706). Thank you everyone!
I get will get the RC0 out on Monday. - Sudheesh On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Jinfeng Ni <[email protected]> wrote: > Agreed with Parth that we probably should start a separate thread to > discuss release version number after 1.9.0. > > I'll start a new thread to discuss that, and leave this thread for > drill 1.9.0 release matters. > > > On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Sudheesh Katkam <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Gentle reminder that all check-ins should be done by tomorrow. Please see > > the latest statuses of commits that we are targeting: > > > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1UJSXLrfUNZwUnx_ > > JzkwAcXSxmcbG7meBDad6ZTxlSmw > > > > Thank you, > > Sudheesh > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Sudheesh Katkam <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> The current list of candidate commits for the release is here: > >> > >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1UJSXLrfUNZwUnx_ > >> JzkwAcXSxmcbG7meBDad6ZTxlSmw > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Subbu Srinivasan < > [email protected] > >> > wrote: > >> > >>> +1. > >>> > >>> On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 10:23 PM, Paul Rogers <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> > For release numbers, 1.10 (then 1.11, 1.12, …) seems like a good > idea. > >>> > > >>> > At first it may seem odd to go to 1.10 from 1.9. Might people get > >>> confused > >>> > between 1.10 and 1.1.0? But, there is precedence. Tomcat’s latest > >>> 7-series > >>> > release is 7.0.72. Java is on 8u112. And so on. > >>> > > >>> > I like the idea of moving to 2.0 later when the team introduces a > major > >>> > change, rather than by default just because the numbers roll around. > For > >>> > example, Hadoop when to 2.x when YARN was introduced. Impala appears > to > >>> > have moved to 2.0 when they added Spill to disk for some (all?) > >>> operators. > >>> > > >>> > - Paul > >>> > > >>> > > On Oct 28, 2016, at 10:34 AM, Sudheesh Katkam <[email protected] > > > >>> > wrote: > >>> > > > >>> > > Hi Drillers, > >>> > > > >>> > > We have a reasonable number of fixes and features since the last > >>> release > >>> > > [1]. Releasing itself takes a while; so I propose we start the 1.9 > >>> > release > >>> > > process. > >>> > > > >>> > > I volunteer as the release manager, unless there are objections. > >>> > > > >>> > > We should also discuss what the release version number should be > after > >>> > 1.9. > >>> > > > >>> > > Thank you, > >>> > > Sudheesh > >>> > > > >>> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL/fixforversion/ > >>> 12337861 > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >> > >> >
