Github user paul-rogers commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/906#discussion_r134295508
--- Diff:
exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/physical/impl/ScanBatch.java
---
@@ -152,97 +157,75 @@ public void kill(boolean sendUpstream) {
}
}
- private void releaseAssets() {
- container.zeroVectors();
- }
-
- private void clearFieldVectorMap() {
- for (final ValueVector v : mutator.fieldVectorMap().values()) {
- v.clear();
- }
- }
-
@Override
public IterOutcome next() {
if (done) {
return IterOutcome.NONE;
}
oContext.getStats().startProcessing();
try {
- try {
- injector.injectChecked(context.getExecutionControls(),
"next-allocate", OutOfMemoryException.class);
-
- currentReader.allocate(mutator.fieldVectorMap());
- } catch (OutOfMemoryException e) {
- clearFieldVectorMap();
- throw UserException.memoryError(e).build(logger);
- }
- while ((recordCount = currentReader.next()) == 0) {
+ while (true) {
--- End diff --
The original logic allocates a batch once per call to `next()`. The new
path allocates vectors once per pass though this loop. Is this desired? If we
make a single pass though the loop, then all is fine. If we make two passes
through the loop, which code releases the vectors allocated on the first pass?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
