The options Ted is thinking of are: -Dcheckstyle.skip -DskipTests
Julian > On Sep 11, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Paul Rogers <prog...@mapr.com> wrote: > >> The check style improvements are good, they will likely save developers >> minutes per day. >> >> I would encourage us to consider other time savers. >> >> In normal development builds, Checkstyle issues should be warnings, not >> errors. Developers waste many five-minute build cycles per day when we do a >> quick & dirty prototype, only to wait for the build and have it fail due to >> trivial check-style errors. > > > Checkstyle is easily defeated when you run with an option similar to the > way that unit tests are commonly defeated during development. > > I don't remember the exact option.