The options Ted is thinking of are:

-Dcheckstyle.skip
-DskipTests

Julian


> On Sep 11, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Paul Rogers <prog...@mapr.com> wrote:
> 
>> The check style improvements are good, they will likely save developers
>> minutes per day.
>> 
>> I would encourage us to consider other time savers.
>> 
>> In normal development builds, Checkstyle issues should be warnings, not
>> errors. Developers waste many five-minute build cycles per day when we do a
>> quick & dirty prototype, only to wait for the build and have it fail due to
>> trivial check-style errors.
> 
> 
> Checkstyle is easily defeated when you run with an option similar to the
> way that unit tests are commonly defeated during development.
> 
> I don't remember the exact option.

Reply via email to