Github user paul-rogers commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/1032#discussion_r150679636
  
    --- Diff: 
exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/planner/sql/DynamicRootSchema.java
 ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
    +/*
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
    + * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
    + * distributed with this work for additional information
    + * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
    + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
    + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
    + * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +package org.apache.drill.exec.planner.sql;
    +
    +import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableSortedSet;
    +import com.google.common.collect.Lists;
    +import com.google.common.collect.Sets;
    +import org.apache.calcite.DataContext;
    +import org.apache.calcite.jdbc.CalciteRootSchema;
    +import org.apache.calcite.jdbc.CalciteSchema;
    +
    +import org.apache.calcite.linq4j.tree.Expression;
    +import org.apache.calcite.linq4j.tree.Expressions;
    +import org.apache.calcite.schema.SchemaPlus;
    +import org.apache.calcite.schema.impl.AbstractSchema;
    +import org.apache.calcite.util.BuiltInMethod;
    +import org.apache.calcite.util.Compatible;
    +import org.apache.drill.common.exceptions.ExecutionSetupException;
    +import org.apache.drill.exec.store.SchemaConfig;
    +import org.apache.drill.exec.store.StoragePlugin;
    +import org.apache.drill.exec.store.StoragePluginRegistry;
    +import org.apache.drill.exec.store.SubSchemaWrapper;
    +
    +import java.io.IOException;
    +import java.util.Map;
    +import java.util.NavigableSet;
    +import java.util.Set;
    +
    +public class DynamicRootSchema extends DynamicSchema
    +    implements CalciteRootSchema {
    +
    +  /** Creates a root schema. */
    +  DynamicRootSchema(StoragePluginRegistry storages, SchemaConfig 
schemaConfig) {
    +    super(null, new RootSchema(), "");
    +    this.schemaConfig = schemaConfig;
    +    this.storages = storages;
    +  }
    +
    +  @Override
    +  public CalciteSchema getSubSchema(String schemaName, boolean 
caseSensitive) {
    +    CalciteSchema retSchema = getSubSchemaMap().get(schemaName);
    +
    +    if (retSchema == null) {
    +      loadSchemaFactory(schemaName, caseSensitive);
    +    }
    +
    +    retSchema = getSubSchemaMap().get(schemaName);
    +    return retSchema;
    +  }
    +
    +  @Override
    +  public NavigableSet<String> getTableNames() {
    +    Set<String> pluginNames = Sets.newHashSet();
    +    for (Map.Entry<String, StoragePlugin> storageEntry : 
getSchemaFactories()) {
    +      pluginNames.add(storageEntry.getKey());
    +    }
    +    return Compatible.INSTANCE.navigableSet(
    +        ImmutableSortedSet.copyOf(
    +            Sets.union(pluginNames, getSubSchemaMap().keySet())));
    +  }
    +
    +  /**
    +   * load schema factory(storage plugin) for schemaName
    +   * @param schemaName
    +   * @param caseSensitive
    +   */
    +  public void loadSchemaFactory(String schemaName, boolean caseSensitive) {
    +    try {
    +      SchemaPlus thisPlus = this.plus();
    +      StoragePlugin plugin = getSchemaFactories().getPlugin(schemaName);
    +      if (plugin != null) {
    +        plugin.registerSchemas(schemaConfig, thisPlus);
    +      }
    --- End diff --
    
    If the name is `dfs.test`, we first look up the compound name, then the 
parts? Why? Do we put the compound names in the map? Or can we have one schema 
named "dfs.test" and another called `dfs`.`test`? Or, can this code be 
restructured a bit?


---

Reply via email to