weijietong commented on a change in pull request #1334: DRILL-6385: Support 
JPPD feature
URL: https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/1334#discussion_r205965375
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/work/filter/BloomFilterCreator.java
 ##########
 @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.drill.exec.work.filter;
+
+import io.netty.buffer.DrillBuf;
+import org.apache.drill.exec.memory.BufferAllocator;
+
+public class BloomFilterCreator {
 
 Review comment:
   Rethink about this point , I think the current one join column one bloom 
filter strategy is right. I would prefer this strategy. To your example , let's 
assume t1.a1 is a low cardinality column (assume a sex column ), t1.b1 is a 
high cardinality column. If we take the multi-join column one bloom filter 
strategy, the required bloom filter's memory size should keep the same 
proportion with the joint two column cardinality size. So this is not 
acceptable. To the current implementation, the low cardinality joint column 
will only consume low memory size, the high cardinality column will consume 
another independent part of bloom filter memory. To the high cardinality column 
case ,maybe we can later add an option to decide whether to enable this bloom 
filter to push down.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to