weijietong commented on a change in pull request #1600: DRILL-6947: fix 
RuntimeFilter memory leak
URL: https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/1600#discussion_r250042986
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/physical/impl/filter/RuntimeFilterRecordBatch.java
 ##########
 @@ -224,21 +224,39 @@ private void applyRuntimeFilter() throws 
SchemaChangeException {
     setupHashHelper();
     //To make each independent bloom filter work together to construct a final 
filter result: BitSet.
     BitSet bitSet = new BitSet(originalRecordCount);
-    for (int i = 0; i < toFilterFields.size(); i++) {
-      BloomFilter bloomFilter = bloomFilters.get(i);
-      String fieldName = toFilterFields.get(i);
-      computeBitSet(field2id.get(fieldName), bloomFilter, bitSet);
-    }
+
+    int filterSize = toFilterFields.size();
     int svIndex = 0;
-    for (int i = 0; i < originalRecordCount; i++) {
-      boolean contain = bitSet.get(i);
-      if (contain) {
-        sv2.setIndex(svIndex, i);
-        svIndex++;
-      } else {
-        filteredRows++;
+    if (filterSize == 1) {
+      BloomFilter bloomFilter = bloomFilters.get(0);
+      String fieldName = toFilterFields.get(0);
+      int fieldId = field2id.get(fieldName);
+      for (int rowIndex = 0; rowIndex < originalRecordCount; rowIndex++) {
+        long hash = hash64.hash64Code(rowIndex, 0, fieldId);
+        boolean contain = bloomFilter.find(hash);
+        if (contain) {
+          sv2.setIndex(svIndex, rowIndex);
+          svIndex ++;
+        }
+      }
+    } else {
+      for (int i = 0; i < toFilterFields.size(); i++) {
+        BloomFilter bloomFilter = bloomFilters.get(i);
+        String fieldName = toFilterFields.get(i);
+        computeBitSet(field2id.get(fieldName), bloomFilter, bitSet);
+      }
+      for (int i = 0; i < originalRecordCount; i++) {
+        boolean contain = bitSet.get(i);
+        if (contain) {
+          sv2.setIndex(svIndex, i);
+          svIndex++;
+        } else {
+          filteredRows++;
+        }
 
 Review comment:
   To single filter condition , it saves some instruction execution time , so 
it make sense to do this change.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to