I think that looks like a great addition.

+1 for James.

I don't think that lazy consensus is a great idea, however. Happily, you
now have three positives.


On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 11:00 AM Charles Givre <cgi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello all,
> I'd like to call a vote for James Turton for committer.  James has been
> doing some serious work on the Drill website and documentation.   I'd like
> to use the lazy consensus option for this vote (
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus <
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus>). This means
> that silence implies consent.   If nobody objects by Monday, I'll assume
> lazy consensus and proceed.
>
> Thanks!
> -- C

Reply via email to