Hi James,

Sure, I am gonna handle this.

Best,
Jingchuan

On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 9:38 PM James Turton <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Jinghcuan
>
> As soon as we get a fix merged for DRILL-8200 [1], a high severity
> security bug, how about you start cherry picking bug fixes into a 1.20.1
> branch? I'm working on DRILL-8200 but we need an update of the Hadoop
> "winutils" and the publisher we source those from hasn't yet uploaded
> one for Hadoop 3.2.3 [2]. If they don't I'm sure we can build our own.
> I'll also revisit the -hadoop2 build question.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-8200
> [2] https://github.com/cdarlint/winutils/issues/29
>
> Thanks
> James
>
> On 2022/04/13 17:28, Jingchuan Hu wrote:
> > Hi James,
> >
> > It's my great honor that I can help you with bug fix release.
> > For the hadoop2 support solution, maybe we could start a vote in our
> > community.
> >
> > Best,
> > Jingchuan
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 4:41 PM James Turton <[email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> >     Hi Jingchuan Hu
> >
> >     The next major release is a long way off but, if nobody objects to
> the
> >     idea, would you like to work with me to produce bug fix releases for
> >     1.20?  This is new territory for our project but I think we could
> start
> >     in one of our forks by cherry picking only the bug fix commits from
> the
> >     master branch to the 1.20.0 branch (the trailing .0 in that branch
> name
> >     is perhaps a little unfortunate) that was created by the last major
> >     release.  We can then open a PR to the 1.20.0 branch in the main repo
> >     and do a review.  Once that's approved and merged we can attach a new
> >     tag of drill-1.20.1 and then do the Maven release plugin
> >     incantations to
> >     produce and upload the new build artifacts.  As we go we can document
> >     and script the process in the way that the major release process has
> >     been.
> >
> >     We'll naturally be led to revisit the -hadoop2 build in the process,
> >     which is a good thing because it is unsatisfactory in its current
> form
> >     which creates a whole new version of Drill (1.20.0-hadoop2),
> including
> >     source control features like the branch and tag, and is not sensible
> >     since this is only a build of 1.20.x under a different profile, not
> >     some
> >     independent version of Drill.  Unfortunately the Maven release
> plugins
> >     we use didn't seem to support this scenario, at least when I looked
> >     while releasing 1.20, so one possibility here is that the project
> >     decides to provide Hadoop 2 support in source form only: users who
> want
> >     to run with Hadoop 2 must build themselves.  We would not be the only
> >     Apache project to do this see e.g. HBase, Phoenix.  Or, half way, we
> >     provide a deployable tarball for -hadoop2 but that's it, we don't
> >     populate our Maven repo with the corresponding artifacts.
> >
> >     James
> >
> >     On 2022/03/20 17:15, Jingchuan Hu wrote:
> >      > Hi team,
> >      >
> >      > I am here to apply for the role as the release manager of the
> >     next drill
> >      > release.
> >      >
> >      > As a newcomer to the Drill community. I tried to help the
> >     community to get
> >      > known by more users through the Drill web-site Chinese version
> setup.
> >      > Committed several PRs for Drill bug fix. Also, helped to
> >     summarize the
> >      > keynotes of Drill online meetup for our community members to
> >     easily "Async"
> >      > with Drill activities. And I want to keep those contributions
> >     with better
> >      > quality in the future.
> >      >
> >      > Over the six months after I joined the community, I am deeply
> >     impressed by
> >      > our community member's dedication and intelligence. No matter
> >     whether I
> >      > could be the release manager, I hope that I can grow with Drill.
> >      >
> >      > If there are some suggestions for me, I would really appreciate
> it.
> >      >
> >      > Sincerely,
> >      > Jingchuan
> >      >
> >
>

Reply via email to