On 09/11/05, jetztgradnet (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/DROOLS-431?page=comments#action_50455 ] > > jetztgradnet commented on DROOLS-431: > ------------------------------------- > > Oops, priority should be minor... sorry. > > > Rules in State Example are missing drools.modify() statement in > consequence > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Key: DROOLS-431 > > URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/DROOLS-431 > > Project: drools > > Type: Bug > > Components: site docs > > Reporter: jetztgradnet > > > > > > > The State Example on the website shows rules setting states. Although > the boxes with the rule snippets are subtitled with "Note: Prior to the > beta-16 release, the syntax was simply "modifyObject(...)" instead of " > drools.modifyObject(...)", the rules themselves are missing the > drools.modify() statement after x.setState("FINISHED") in the > corresponding consequence element > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > - > If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa > - > For more information on JIRA, see: > http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira > >
-- Paul Browne Senior Consultant Work:087-1224449 Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> FirstPartners.Net <http://www.firstpartners.net>
