that's the nature of decision table approach, so if you want to avoid that I
wouldn't use decision table approach.  other business rule IDE use a model
driven approach.

peter


On 12/2/05, Subir Das <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Peter Lin <woolfel <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> >
> > not sure I understand the question.  a decision table is like a state
> chart.
> >
> > Say I have an object with 10 attributes. the number of attributes don't
> > matter for rules. What matters is the number of unique conditions the
> rules
> > will use to evaluate the data.  Or put it another way.
> >
> > the number of columns is equal to the number of unique conditions.
> > each row is a rule, which means each row has 1 or more columns checked.
> >
> > I haven't tried michael's decision table plugin, but that's generally
> how
> > decision tables work in the tools I've seen.
> >
> > peter
> >
> > On 11/28/05, Subir Das <subir_k_das <at> hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Felipe,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your response.
> > > So, if I have, say, 5 numeric attributes for setting up conditions, I
> need
> > > to
> > > have 15 columns in the decision table. As conditions will change with
> > > course of
> > > time and may be, at some point of time, those 15 columns will either
> be
> > > extended or reduced. Hence I am just wondering if there is any better
> way
> > > of
> > > configuring the same.
> > >
> > > Cheers.
> > >
> > > Subir
> > >
> > >
> >
> Sorry for replying late. I did't get any email when you responded. I have
> just
> seen it in the gmane site.
>
> Let's say I need to set up a RuleSet based on 5 numeric attributes
> N1,N2,N3,N4
> and N5.
> And I need to set up conditions as follows :
>
> N1 > $param1
> N1 == $param2
> N1 < $param3
>
> N2 > $param4
> N2 == $param5
> N2 < $param6
>
> N3 > $param7
> N3 == $param8
> N3 < $param9
>
> N4 > $param10
> N4 == $param11
> N4 < $param12
>
> N5 > $param13
> N5 == $param14
> N5 < $param15
>
> Later the Business Analyst may like to add more conditions or take off
> some
> conditions which eventually will result in adding or deleting columns
> (conditions) in the decision table. I am just wondering if there is better
> way
> to configure the rules.
>
> Cheers,
> Subir
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to