I am wondering if I've undercovered a fault with this scenario. Should I generate a bug report?
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 10:38 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [drools-user] Chaining Rules Guys: What I can prove now is the second rule is not firing...... Is anyone chaining rules together? I show in the flow the second rule is being aserted: [ConditionTested: rule=AuditTask; condition=[Condition: taskVO2.getStatus().equalsIgnoreCase("OPEN") == true]; passed=true; tuple={[]}] [ConditionTested: rule=AuditTask; condition=[Condition: taskVO2.getTaskType().equalsIgnoreCase("ADFPAYCHK") == true]; passed=true; tuple={[]}] [ConditionTested: rule=AuditTask; condition=[Condition: taskVO2.containsIdentifier("CONTRACT", "S#1234567890") == true]; passed=true; tuple={[]}] [ActivationCreated: rule=AuditTask; tuple={[]}] Yet, I have placed a System.out.println within the <java:consequence> tag. It is not getting this far.......as it never prints out. I have done the same step in the first rule and the statement is printed. Any suggestions or debug steps would be greatly appreciated. Russ
