well going direct from RuleML to the AST may be possible with the right mapping tools, I am sure (but I am a bit out of touch with those tools). Going via a "native" XML format may be easier, as it means that different versions of RuleML/whatever replaces it can be supported with XSLT, which may be easier for people to maintain then direct mappings.
Any XML mapping gurus out there please speak up ! On 3/20/06, Jayaram C S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Mark Proctor <mproctor <at> codehaus.org> writes: > > > > > As my email mentions, it should be a matter of creating a .xsd that maps > > to the DESCR AST - which XMLBeans can then use. Unless someone in the > > community picks this up, its unlikely to make it into 3.0. > > > > Mark > > > > > I think it would be better if we can make a translator from RuleML or some > standard Rule Language to the DESCR AST. This would allow users to create > interfaces or author the rules in a standard environment and allow it to > be used > with DROOLS. Advantage is that we can make Rule engine a pluggable > component > into a rule environment. > > Regards > Jayaram > > >
