> rule "politician" > when > not exist politician (honest == true) > then > incarcerate all politicians > > In the not join case, there may be multiple matches that will fire. in the > Not exist case, it should only fire that rule once. > Ok, and what about the following scenario: - at some point there is no honest politician (==> rule fires) - next a honest politician is asserted gets asserted (==> rule is no longer applicable) - then this politician is removed again (or becomes dishonest)
What would/should happen in this case? Would/should the rule fire once more or not?
