A painters house is never painted. A builders house is never finished etc..
;)
On 4/22/06, Peter Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> that's assuming sumatra is half way done, which it isn't.
>
> :)
>
> peter
>
> On 4/21/06, Mark Proctor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > While you are at it stick sumatra behind your interfaces - so then we
> > have 3 algorithm implementations :)
> >
> > Mark
> > Peter Lin wrote:
> > > yeah... I don't see why not. feel free to update the performance test
> > > that's already in the examples directory.
> > >
> > > peter
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/21/06, Alexander Bagerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Peter,
> > >> Would it be possible to make tests flexible enough that we can
> profile
> > >> reteoo and leaps at the same time? It 's as simple as getting
> RuleBase
> > >>
> > >> protected RuleBase getLeapsRuleBase() throws Exception {
> > >> return new org.drools.leaps.RuleBaseImpl();
> > >> }
> > >> protected RuleBase getReteRuleBase() throws Exception {
> > >> return new RuleBaseImpl();
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> everything else should be pretty much the same
> > >>
> > >> On 4/21/06, Peter Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>
> http://woolfel.blogspot.com/2006/04/more-drools-benchmark-planned.html
> > >>> http://woolfel.blogspot.com/2006/04/more-drools3-performance.html
> > >>>
> > >>> Here are some more performance numbers for drools 3, and ideas for
> > >>>
> > >> further
> > >>
> > >>> tests
> > >>>
> > >>> peter
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
